![minimum miscibility pressure winprop minimum miscibility pressure winprop](https://www.mdpi.com/processes/processes-08-00360/article_deploy/html/images/processes-08-00360-g009.png)
Experimental investigation of CO2 -miscible oil recovery at different conditions. An artificial neural network model for predicting gas pipeline induced voltage caused by power lines under fault conditions. Paper PETSOC-2000-001 Presented at the Canadian Interna-tional Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, 4-8 June, 2000.Īl-Alawi, S., Al-Badi, A., Ellithy, K. Experimental determination of minimum miscibility pressure. USA, University of Texas at Austin, 2011.Īhmad, W., Vakili-Nezhaad, G., Al-Bemani, A.S., et al. Advances in calculation of mini-mum miscibility pressure. A reliable strategy to calculate minimum miscibility pressure of CO2 -oil system in miscible gas flooding processes. Connectionist model for predicting minimum gas miscibility pressure: Application to gas injection process. Multiple-mixing-cell method for MMP calculations. USA, Colorado School of Mines, 2014.Īhmadi, K., Johns, R.T. Experimental approach to investigate minimum miscibility pressures in the Bakken. Estimation of minimum miscibility pressure of varied gas compositions and reservoir crude oil over a wide range of conditions using an artificial neural network model.
![minimum miscibility pressure winprop minimum miscibility pressure winprop](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bruno-Fernandes-30/publication/263374028/figure/tbl4/AS:669381868679170@1536604482182/Comparison-of-saturation-pressure-of-the-present-work-and-Winprop-case-study-2.png)
Among the available published correlations, the Yellig and Metcalfe correlation demonstrates good prediction performance, but it is not as accurate as the developed ANN model.Ĭited as: Choubineh, A., Helalizadeh, A., Wood, D.A. Sensitivity analysis reveals that injected gas specific gravity and temperature are the most important factors to consider when establishing appropriate miscible injection conditions. The ANN model predictions achieve a mean absolute percentage error of 13.46%, root mean square error of 3.6 and Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.95. Statistical comparison of predictions shows that the developed ANN model yields better predictions than empirical-correlation methods. A key benefit of the ANN model is that MMP can be determined with reasonable accuracy for a wide range of oil and gas compositions.
![minimum miscibility pressure winprop minimum miscibility pressure winprop](https://reader017.pdfslide.net/reader017/html5/js20200117/5e21ce8407d55/5e21ce85c8bb2.png)
The model is correlated with the reservoir temperature, concentrations of volatile (C1 and N2) and intermediate (C2, C3, C4, CO2 and H2S) fractions in the oil (Vol/Inter), C5+ molecular weight fractions in the oil and injected gas specific gravity. This approach is relevant to sequestration projects in which injected gas compositions might vary significantly. Here an artificial neural network (ANN) model is applied to a dataset involving 251 data records from around the world in a novel way to estimate the gas-crude oil MMP for a wide range of injected gases and crude oil compositions. Available miscibility correlations attempt to predict the minimum miscibility pressure for a specific type of gas.
![minimum miscibility pressure winprop minimum miscibility pressure winprop](https://0.academia-photos.com/attachment_thumbnails/71582505/mini_magick20211006-19716-rv8c6q.png)
Experimental and non-experimental methods are used to estimate MMP. Minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) is a key variable for monitoring miscibility between reservoir fluid and injection gas.